Funny story, however the link you provided is all wrong. There's no ambiguity in the New Testament about who is to blame for the death of Christ. Pilate found Jesus not guilty, but the Jews pressed him so he sent him to Herod, who found him not guilty, and returned him. Pilate then scourged Jesus, hoping to placate the Jews, who then pressed for crucifixion. The high priests threatened Pilate by renouncing the Messiah by saying, "We have no King but Ceasar", implying that they were loyal to Ceasar (but perhaps Pilate was not so loyal). Pilate clearly didn't believe Jesus was guilty, for the crowd went on to say, "Let his blood be upon us and our children". Pilate's washing of his hands is further evidence that he found no guilt in Christ. Pilate was weak and gave in, fearful both of a rebellion and the likely consequences from Rome, so he shares in the guilt but clearly the Romans weren't concerned with Jesus of Nazareth.

Can we blame Jews today for what their ancestors did 2,000 years ago? Of course not, and neither should we hate anyone, but if you accept scripture as infallible you can't deny the story.